X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:59:29 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? In-Reply-To: <20150705092042.7F4318038A2D@turkos.aspodata.se> Message-ID: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150705021010 DOT 369968038A2C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20150705092042 DOT 7F4318038A2D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 5 Jul 2015, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: > Would enhancing the c-lib libgeda be more accepted now than for four > years ago ? Accepted by whom? The users, the developers, the would-be developers or the would-be contributors? I'd certainly be happier if new features and new code would go in the C part and scheme would be reduced in the long run, so I'd accept such upgrades. Regards, Igor2