X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: karl AT aspodata DOT se To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? In-reply-to: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150705021010 DOT 369968038A2C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Sun, 05 Jul 2015 03:28:50 -0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20150705092042.7F4318038A2D@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 11:20:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Evan Foss: > The community of developers had a different make up 4 years ago. My > opinion on things is somewhere between John Dotty who is asking for > people to use rigger in PCB and is still developing using Scheme and (What is "rigger" in this context?) > Igor2 who acknowledges that Scheme is harder to find developers for. > > Imagine if the source was written in PL/I. How much development in the > future would you expect it to get? You don't have to convince me. I have a dev. account and I started working on libgeda docs., but real world issues has distracted me. Would enhancing the c-lib libgeda be more accepted now than for four years ago ? Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57