X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=1DR739JXaK/nqy2z8tXcjVWszTUe2qVEXrHB6AtqSaI=;
        b=tkAGRx52J+88iZ5ae+YKB29WY1+4Xd99d77BqdTQ6lN+jQrTTmVP7b0Ul1zaGznCNj
         ByAdYaOtdNjjmiAbybvz3+EGomG4Y6/zMn0QoYZCyMrv0TLeLfIi/iKW4uaDWpPxJIA7
         pqW2SvI/4XP0LiloUuNMAnzC6HxkXxcbPl3Ap/6SYmD7Ptu0v2X4tGutuXY7flWn405j
         1Bj152l+FB8EUuIQL5DcAdvYr0Hf1xg7RW1TsENyYwG7v3g8rnMnDxKLxwEdgT9S2ZhB
         dvOmh74Ho0fKhv8bXCHMTVz0pws1YQZN/wDP5oEXWhaVVRlX8cUCrxFWEOS5w21xdWVB
         O2dw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.6.1 with SMTP id w1mr40744908law.91.1436034377499; Sat,
 04 Jul 2015 11:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150704181229.9423.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <CAM2RGhSkHSm8h571=3GePQUm-HAnxeb7-HCF=p2a+QUzP6rNkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507041329400 DOT 8210 AT nimbus>
	<CAM2RGhSzNfL0yy49ZLhLY-G8+JxRxVnMRqVaoN3OiSzwV8v9oA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150704181229 DOT 9423 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 18:26:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhT=h-gTSd-F+dUoq+EWFgjT_QqjWJ+b2RtUwisEbnMTTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] libgeda3
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I might have miss read it but I got the impression it was a re-write in python.

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> Roland, No offense but I am trying to add onto what already exists.
>> gEDA already suffers from too much fragmentation of effort.
>
> I think Roland is also adding onto what already exists.
>
> It makes a lot of sense to me to keep code with strong ties together,
> case in point gschem and libgeda.
>
> Adding a new library and interface onto what already exists is a good
> development if the library and interface make sense. It seems they do.
>
> I think Xorn sounds useful, and it doesn't seem to take anything away
> from anywhere else.
>
>
> //Peter



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/