X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=q/h7iRzXXe8mKbBIDDIw2rCYB0MYW1tZJyN6RIEPHmw=; b=O5bsGLjyfa2Z//D7w53SpJ1RzHy00IL/b8tcCiMKVSTpsxCBPo22tWbUu30XrQxrBf FoPbDpBa6MRb/dIvQ81vW7xxQDMnWQ1gbzlAYFEBj4MvyABWK1CdfKBMFa9hyYAmhoCb 453mAHLbAe2Rf6GcvAkajFgfr1pYGAZmN+5WLMISfmH1GB6BM+Q/LBkOgH44ROfyBTkk aiv5Hx41aZOFJc+skPy5FIriddWF9AsENv4TZ51dld7tan+mS5PM2hjjWpxRVwGmvPjg u/ArSGA+DzCm+x5uYEJoTQGvoErbrggO2ap+Cj6/lTyNf/KMjoRzUxPaIkD138G7WZY0 8yMA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl5CivxYlJXpMHM+M9gXshdI6V3mj2ae32AFbF/e2WJD93+X9SaUix7A7XDuv0Och1v2x+j X-Received: by 10.112.219.70 with SMTP id pm6mr38231984lbc.41.1435990405422; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 23:13:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mjd AT hackvana DOT com X-Originating-IP: [120.21.162.27] In-Reply-To: <20150703030409.32398.qmail@stuge.se> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> From: "Mitch Davis (mjd+geda-user AT hackvana DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:13:05 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: i3aOVpM8fLB_bbr0Qd7lP0utTp0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Stefan Salewski wrote: > > maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is > > nearly death is wrong? > > Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite > strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around! > Maybe that was his intention. If so, seems to have worked. (grumble troll grumble) Mitch. --001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Peter Stuge = (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <= geda-user AT delori= e.com> wrote:
Stefan Salewski wrote:
> maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is
> nearly death is wrong?

Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around!

Maybe that was his intention.=C2=A0 If so, seems to hav= e worked.

(grumble troll grumble)

Mitch.
--001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242--