X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fi9f0F1XUi7i2pf+Oz+wPqDwDn8w01Nv7xwBveQswFI=; b=uF7EJcLcY0bRlugwn2KNkHAdKr0c3IOi9r3qzEgRdOIvE9ntfKi0FOQ3P1UGxXNzvx HMPvH0qFtTTsdVoO75+05xkAVb7V+QTjvU0R7Vo6kXx6q4NgnN0JpCV9Hv2Z9wux4gW8 MOGN6/pcL5D4dYNmXz8Lb3G8sHaMOLHEv4ZDWUU4RGnAMaCxQBqbavI4ZQjFtYYCY42k XUDsn6Ys4u4GpDjmpfH6Cw9RXcx79v/8G4KO9clGhP/vU+Ma9J53lCCOPhGjWzXC+B4f 2hI5RZmaWTxXMKkvJrml11WHBn40d7IrulbS3eQkDGcmTg0//qvVrlnSQV82mrBe1Eat hUSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr28264302laj.69.1435806367222; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 20:06:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55944E4B.8020209@m0n5t3r.info> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435666431 DOT 676 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <5833A5F3-C17B-409D-A3B3-553F9DCFEAC5 AT noqsi DOT com> <5592ABB1 DOT 7090404 AT plastitar DOT com> <724860AC-6174-478A-AFD9-A1B117161F58 AT noqsi DOT com> <201506301643 DOT t5UGhLNR020245 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55944E4B DOT 8020209 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 03:06:07 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? [offtopic] From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk As far as I can tell kicad is having the same issue with eeschema that geda has with PCB http://ci.kicad-pcb.org/job/kicad-doxygen/ws/Documentation/doxygen/html/md_Documentation_development_road-map.html look for "Coherent SCHEMATIC Object" Actually looking at that list geda kind of feels like it is in many ways ahead of them. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Sabin Iacob (iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 07/01/2015 10:38 PM, John Doty wrote: >> On Jul 1, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: >> >>> For what its worth, I fell that the EDA suites to compare to is not $$$ >>> but kicad. >> Kicad is complementary to gEDA in a way similar to OpenOffice versus Latex. Integrated tool versus toolkit. Both have their place. >> >> > > > I'm pretty sure he was comparing on a per-component basis; for instance, > even if I find Kicad's PCB thing unusable, it has some neat things I'd > love to see in pcb (drag traces around and they stay connected _and_ > keep their angles, push/shove traces, helpers for length matching, (not > sure about) bus/multiple trace routing, nets displayed if the zoom level > is high enough... [1]). > > I think the Kicad gschem equivalent is roughly similar from a basic user > point of view - the differences were mostly cosmetic last time I tried > to use it (1-2 years ago). > > > [1] this is what I've been able to gather from YouTube videos - I'm > never able to find anything in the actual pcbnew, I just keep it > installed because I might have to open something created with it > sometimes; I do start it every few months only to promptly get lost and > kill it with fire. > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/