X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=r3HzaEBycUDey6Y2jJ+Hf5Smt47j79mnAcVP12JuqJA=; b=o46bwHWg2h6/0eJfTk6GlBSo+M4tHf4+GWRN/EMr4KCJzoHzxas8CXfdNa3nyxlCuX U2Vqd7Z8ODZXZ9FjHsTy/DLp6uzCajF3Ld2SaUGhK6e57YXWOYcneLdKtQpvjOaNKSHg gr62LGkAD6m/LhhLbQd2TpedK7Wy711dcVgNmiKn69r7UezCfuPDAPRCbIJOD4JcfY3c GyYqYaNE/+srl0TRYXJTvk5kDKqR+KG3YBP46Mzp04zpigc7YYN/GZwo9Z6YIrttgVxa yOFPQkx6+EIspA0fWuO0dPuhH1SSaXs2xZKy2+oWc75G2UZqK02RXjVKWJoadWjzGWmH vrPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.7.206 with SMTP id l14mr19796199laa.3.1435673177704; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 07:06:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435666431 DOT 676 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:06:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Igor, I would like to see M4 brought back but with some kind of idiots guide. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Evan Foss wrote: > John Doty : On the same notion we should have split off PCB's gcode > export so that it ran as a stand alone utility using gerbv library. > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Evan Foss wrote: >> John Doty : In the name of a more open workflow I was advocating PCB >> changing/adding TSV as an accepted input format for the other >> attributes I was suggesting. The idea being to break out of the >> workflow issues you see in PCB. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: >>> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote: >>>> it would be nice if I could just draw the schematics, choose >>>> footprints for it, route the PCB, and send the Gerber files to the >>>> fab. >>> >>> Sure. I think that is the main reason that so many people (at least here >>> in Germany) are using Eagle. Eagle is not very powerful, not very easy >>> to use or beautiful, but has a large collection of trustful symbols and >>> footprint. >>> >>> For FOSS EDA situation is not that good. Some people may create some >>> symbols or footprints and maybe make them public available, but do not >>> care much about systematically naming or quality. There are a few >>> exceptions of course, Mr Luciano (name may be misspelled) tried to >>> create high quality PCB footprints, and some people at gedasymbols tried >>> it also. I am not sure if situation is really better for KiCAD. And >>> converters from commercial products like Eagle? I do not think that is >>> really legal and that commercial companies will like that. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Home >> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ >> Work >> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ > > > > -- > Home > http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ > Work > http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/