X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nIICo7cNkv0CkNINqHAFbAnasJjFxly8K3uiBAwJJC8=; b=a5gsxIbHNUVUT8dMu6u5Hr3TOPBqr1uau/602SGCtJTPDkHrjdNFCc6PBwa9dGdd+t Y6slgj6reM5aWBBLF2bGLWA2uJBdsUTyr9U7k3ws/S6JsnBswlLIL6GD4vC4wYDZZaYi XLDTRBje/SrdGjxvWtACucX43yB62i2wX/kOgJaWixgLvCgxvaX0gSUSdfZAfnyR2qpn N+cimccFNzd04OJknOsszOE0Ik8tThzxKJ29Uu6hAA6wElb0YIWtAw1Bg3FE5ciaes3k e9dAB2pdUGUzfstIlzH6sky5Gg1GTL6UVo/Ql9crCCIe4ybxwIpch3GXEy6m8DZMihNB d2OQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.26.163 with SMTP id m3mr19917638lag.86.1435673139751; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 07:05:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435666431 DOT 676 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:05:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty : On the same notion we should have split off PCB's gcode export so that it ran as a stand alone utility using gerbv library. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Evan Foss wrote: > John Doty : In the name of a more open workflow I was advocating PCB > changing/adding TSV as an accepted input format for the other > attributes I was suggesting. The idea being to break out of the > workflow issues you see in PCB. > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote: >>> it would be nice if I could just draw the schematics, choose >>> footprints for it, route the PCB, and send the Gerber files to the >>> fab. >> >> Sure. I think that is the main reason that so many people (at least here >> in Germany) are using Eagle. Eagle is not very powerful, not very easy >> to use or beautiful, but has a large collection of trustful symbols and >> footprint. >> >> For FOSS EDA situation is not that good. Some people may create some >> symbols or footprints and maybe make them public available, but do not >> care much about systematically naming or quality. There are a few >> exceptions of course, Mr Luciano (name may be misspelled) tried to >> create high quality PCB footprints, and some people at gedasymbols tried >> it also. I am not sure if situation is really better for KiCAD. And >> converters from commercial products like Eagle? I do not think that is >> really legal and that commercial companies will like that. >> > > > > -- > Home > http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ > Work > http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/