X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=P8RMpKmSGVh+F5AYJL0cq4xe7BtkeEDCePy/9SGottE=;
        b=y7rOont/ZzNF2If2QMyt0mICyJVJYgpzZhHkOAiOB/8jDZEkAPZlYbD9rwXkX5HpII
         mYPjyKwR5ZXadUsSLkBDopgX7tPda+me63yXjI650OfdmNZKGLhjyk6pIz4wbZfupYK+
         JJUBqrCiyZ6oxcms/ZrplbQ+0ywhKHdn3WQTRuwzPkGYgRBemt1ent1NA5HDu19zmXMC
         CLTTtypTKE9q3euTvtuv1QcdrZX43c08JYhNbNJTfBAjuT2klQ+knw/g7kYGdt013STW
         jx72eXcrVYpO3F/7VaQALC3v3jfwDC2zoAjXYQoArDCyoRs9XCpEfrguCKOhXM2QMQ2P
         AGGw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr16611494laj.69.1435622376105;
 Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhT2eY-cKJ0FZZD2Au+ppSghx4Cjr5bbQvZWbgBPY8nkzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<D8B09027-EF94-4C8D-ADC8-C5CCEAC36552 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<1435599996 DOT 2704 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<B8DD3FDA-D554-4DCD-A97D-42CE7215A5CB AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTqnxzn5NAS10aQC+6Ws0k6TwJjYVo8iuL6QA7h1OA6uA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201506292033 DOT t5TKXq06009463 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<13D3A00C-EA98-458A-BC3F-213653FA806A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150629212401 DOT GD28458 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<175C24CA-D7F9-4DD0-BC8C-09A2784BA6C1 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQJ4YuSbAVa6KSs=rCAJKruMS5XTN4YS+0MWbDhR3bGJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT2eY-cKJ0FZZD2Au+ppSghx4Cjr5bbQvZWbgBPY8nkzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:59:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhTT13KVgFvHuMb3hQWKhW7Q55eM3pyO4se0FGj=cyKTvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5TNxe2d001783
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

It would be nice to change the way PCB takes data in. I like the
netlist handling but something more CSV or tab delineated would be
nice for the rest of the stuff.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> John Doty : That said I would rather specify trace properties than
> component distances. One of them is more explicit than the other. If
> anything for thermal reasons the ability to specify distances as a
> minimum between components would actually make more sense.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> John Doty : I agree with you. If I do anything it would just be adding
>> extra attributes to gschem and then making another tool to collect
>> them. Something to work in parallel to the netlisters.
>>
>> In the meantime don't worry I am too busy chasing down BSDL file stuff.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:47 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:54:33PM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 2:33 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John, I have frequently marked off in the comment field how long/wide
>>>>>>> traces can/should be. It would be nice if there was some meaningful
>>>>>>> way to pass that to PCB. That would involve gschem changes in minor
>>>>>>> ways. I am not asking anyone to implement this. Just defending a
>>>>>>> position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> File->Import imports all attributes as element attributes.  I don't
>>>>>> know of anything that *does* anything with it though, aside from some
>>>>>> BOM scripts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, but the problem is that it can’t import attributes of net
>>>>> segments, since they aren’t in one of the gnetlist views. Gnetlist
>>>>> can’t even see the segments, only the glommed-together nets. And then,
>>>>> nets aren’t “elements”.
>>>> It obviously can do it, since libgeda API has means for it. Once again,
>>>> see my scheme script above in the thread.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That’s using the gschem API, not the gnetlist API.
>>>
>>> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
>>> http://www.noqsi.com/
>>> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Home
>> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
>> Work
>> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
>
>
>
> --
> Home
> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
> Work
> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/