X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OlbCB0wUKKIU/lKtbX4P5TRmNaAHSUkxfO2VuWezXBo=; b=X3Bvkf2pNsbWZPq9mMNk3gGYNHIwf7RZBnfWCkydVPF+85frOWGdejeklklF87xgS8 cEKihFfia/ZlupuxXjkzAPlYf22hgwhSBR4tggdBAH8+VIzMqgZzNkZGZahz5V+xoQGO Mn1/JZkV/vzvUTkBFM9kwBpIE9vhuvcA06Fz5lmgRVCUaqhLfQdlR64R3Us/VTGZq95b U0V5s9Q9vUyNOBsARVhNLWMKnguXlNhU1dFlgGOu3ZTW8HsGXQlofpk8/9ilQ/Z9xyDF /pN5rIYCb2TjEqQKAwC+Z/irNRRqgq/3YmLv3aVo48ZAiSnTQ81lfKuyiHQhlgYQFkm7 HefA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr15372849lbc.86.1435599904703; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:45:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1435598480.2704.2.camel@ssalewski.de> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435598480 DOT 2704 DOT 2 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:45:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Jan Kasprzak I was thinking about that same thing last night. The thing is that one of the nicer things about gEDA is that it is not dependent on some web based platform. I suspect that is why every time anything like that has been suggested it has died off. We need a way to let people rate and comment on symbols and footprints which works on top of SVN, GIT or what ever. Having a file with authenticated votes and comments from other users next to each symbol & footprint would make more sense. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 10:32 -0600, John Doty wrote: >> I use multiline attributes frequently. > > That is interesting. I think long time ago I saw a recommendation > somewhere to use multiline text not for attributes. It is great that we > can use it, I will check how gschem displays it. > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/