X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-UW-Orig-Sender: fpm AT homer01 DOT u DOT washington DOT edu Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:43:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Frank Miles (fpm AT u DOT washington DOT edu)" To: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" cc: kicad-users AT yahoogroups DOT com, foss-pcb AT ohwr DOT org, The Open Source Hardware Association Discussion List Subject: Re: [kicad-users] Re: [geda-user] Any news about FOSS EDA coordination? Import/export, common file format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150608222056 DOT 10601 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <218C63C4-B2B5-4DFB-A995-B170E7591B6F AT noqsi DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1217 2009-02-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.6.15.153316 X-PMX-Server: mxout22.s.uw.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, BODY_PARA_IS_SENTENCE_URL 0.1, MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_900_999 0, REFERENCES 0, URI_ENDS_IN_HTML 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) wrote: > Perhaps starting with the PCB side is a miss step. A lot of the gEDA folks have long wanted to overhaul their PCB stuff anyway for architectural reasons. At > best moving footprints between KiCAD and gEDA's companion PCB would make more sense. > > Alternatively working on schematic interchange could work. The gEDA schematic capture and etc are very well thought out and mature. [snip] For those starting from gschem - there is an easy way to try kicad. See http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/frank_miles/ for a gnetlist script that will generate kicad-compatible netlists. And when you need custom footprints - the python footprint generator from Darrel Harmon will generate either 'pcb' (gEDA) or 'pcbnew' (KiCad) compatible output: http://dlharmon.com/geda/footgen.html So far I don't know of any tools that make the kicad-schematic -> 'pcb' netlist. HTH...