X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nToWD9NE75vA00BZ0bD6eMcFGj+LhlAgz8EqmXmqP+A=; b=NJTfoMPUVZSN95Zy4qAavSqqB3Vix5qaSbkOP0epgboAAZPMbRCDpT/jbpmbYWCHC6 KUcRAXnfRfb2cHzA1ZoinYXijtRXeIJ7xcKREo4xMnGij3bW5nmefZdETjYA4d4EZvZ+ TVSghRnyvw1/jCgZoBdXjglM4b8W2aC5r5Y+8Cyfv10yJDM0YOM3BTP8SE104Zk5Z5ZO 6qJjjixGGtYkneexOd8gHmppjl2Tq0DKl6bmDf/BkI1OQ3DYRfvYpUOKgPDCcgAHHq2Q CFwW9+lwkkzyM5y81XXYkQ5tLh00bCnoJ45NP5h3UkLSCGguIL2txq+u9wFPuCuTG+C4 tkSg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.4.67 with SMTP id i3mr10500746igi.47.1434004164673; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:29:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150608222056 DOT 10601 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <218C63C4-B2B5-4DFB-A995-B170E7591B6F AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:29:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Any news about FOSS EDA coordination? Import/export, common file format From: "timofonic timofonic (timofonic AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Cc: kicad-users AT yahoogroups DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2a13ed789e30518381ce4 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c2a13ed789e30518381ce4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 What's wrong with IP-XACT? On Jun 10, 2015 10:22 PM, "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com)" < geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:25 AM, John Doty wrote: > >> >> >> There was once an effort to do this: EDIF. A lot of people and companies >> put a lot of effort into it, and it failed. But an effort that concentrated >> on the feasible parts of the problem, netlists and BOMs, might succeed. >> >> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >> >> >> > And 20 years later the IC community did the same thing and came up with > IP-Xact that is now meeting the same fate. Those who refuse to study > history.... > > > John Eaton > > > --001a11c2a13ed789e30518381ce4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What's wrong with IP-XACT?

On Jun 10, 2015 10:22 PM, "Ouabache Designw= orks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com)" &= lt;geda-user AT delorie DOT com> w= rote:


On Wed, Ju= n 10, 2015 at 9:25 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:


There was once an effort to do this: EDIF. A lot of= people and companies put a lot of effort into it, and it failed. But an ef= fort that concentrated on the feasible parts of the problem, netlists and B= OMs, might succeed.

John Doty=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0<= /span>Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.




And 20 ye= ars later the IC community did the same thing and came up with IP-Xact that= is now meeting the same fate. Those who refuse to study history....


John= Eaton


--001a11c2a13ed789e30518381ce4--