X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bRDU7S0N0KFHR9nreHnwkLUE3lceAYQgzZpPfK7Tcos=; b=p44AA3u3cvO7TRoyusy7TQzCVqDurlWRq3O4hfQfAwUdqcAMB0tSFjMJvguccoVB87 jbCU0F3/aycsYl69liKVcewOKh6pVrby7gWB+Jd5667LcuecUMlAVArKNuHETFTizjWy JjjM6ygnp0mk+bu8cuae3oCt2meAoOdZ0r246eF210+5l88l/8BesoA1ifI1VKJJkcxK eqa87bf6/MvoukKiGDgQ2r93gyz5JcdG1ybhol5kvd+V3knOS8leW8AB4hUzTFxn8YG2 k8x9KcnENoH4vBQIgEWZ6zdHDmBgHoW9DirNGNSmErhOhSnQbem20SkfG+ACtoeyxzrt VlPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.178.133 with SMTP id cy5mr11845915lac.2.1428299495005; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 22:51:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <435039979 DOT 124044 DOT 1427520523995 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <5520F54F DOT 1040808 AT prochac DOT sk> <20150405111538 DOT 410e52f1 AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55210CB8 DOT 1020202 AT prochac DOT sk> <5521829D DOT 9020004 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <552198C4 DOT 8070107 AT prochac DOT sk> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:51:34 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] 3D view From: Evan Foss To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I guess the functionality I am suggesting is something that needs to run on the users machines working over version control which seems to be in most users workflows. Having it run server side is probably a bad idea. On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Evan Foss wrote: > We have a large public list of symbols and footprints at geda symbols. > We do not have a parallel list of plugins but we really should. > > We also have no public mechanism for vetting any of the user > contributions except for the odd comments on the email list. That is > an area that could use improvement. > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Milan Prochac wrote: >> On 5. 4. 2015 20:44, Sabin Iacob wrote: >>> >>> On 04/05/2015 01:21 PM, Milan Prochac wrote: >>>> >>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>> There is a PCB-plugins package distributed in launchpad.net. I think you >>>>> should consult withe Bert, and release your exporter as a plugin. >>>> >>>> With all respect to Bert's work, who knows about the PCB-plugins >>>> package? Almost nobody - 63 downloads in 4 years... I tried find some >>>> reference to it on gEDA/PCB pages... no luck. >>> >>> >>> you do realise that those are just source downloads for people who want >>> to build it on their own (and don't want to use bzr), right? most Ubuntu >>> / Debian downloads would be from PPAs like >>> https://launchpad.net/~mehanik/+archive/ubuntu/geda-unstable, and those >>> are much harder to measure (Launchpad doesn't report this, for instance). >> >> >> Well, and this page is mentioned somewhere in official documentation? >> >> It is just another separate page, which will live and die with Eugene's will >> to maintain it. And it does not change anything on the fact that plugins are >> not part of project. >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Home > http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ > Work > http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/