X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at papyrus.altaweb.hu Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 12:56:19 +0200 From: Lev To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] 3D view Message-ID: <20150405125619.2e2e8dde@jive> In-Reply-To: <55210CB8.1020202@prochac.sk> References: <435039979 DOT 124044 DOT 1427520523995 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <5520F54F DOT 1040808 AT prochac DOT sk> <20150405111538 DOT 410e52f1 AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55210CB8 DOT 1020202 AT prochac DOT sk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t35AuT0c001081 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 12:21:44 +0200 Milan Prochac wrote: > With all respect to Bert's work, who knows about the PCB-plugins > package? Almost nobody - 63 downloads in 4 years... I tried find some > reference to it on gEDA/PCB pages... no luck. > > Why cannot be these plugins part of PCB's source tree as user > contributions? They would get more attention, I guess. I'm with you. I don't really understand why the core developers reject such contributions. The problem with plugins is that they should be also maintained. So if someone makes a change in PCB, the plugins might not be able to compile anymore. I've seen that before. So I think the plugin way is just one step ahead, and it would be great if your code merged into PCB head. > I will change both my exporters to plugins, some changes are required I think this is one step forward. Again, it would be nice if it was in the main branch of PCB. Levente