X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <5509E915.2090707@systella.fr> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:07:33 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] "Tried and True, Old PCB Design Software Still Going Strong" page 9 is gEDA References: <71C7D46D-93AE-488F-B0E4-728641C2A63B AT noqsi DOT com> In-Reply-To: <71C7D46D-93AE-488F-B0E4-728641C2A63B@noqsi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at rayleigh X-Virus-Status: Clean X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by rayleigh.systella.fr id t2IL7XrE027067 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t2IL7l3F002671 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com John Doty a écrit : > The MIT guy who does prototype layout for my spaceflight instruments uses (and likes) Osmond. I can’t comment on it, though, I don’t use it. On some projects, we use a contractor to lay out the final product. Geda-gaf has the enormous advantage that I can easily export the same schematics to a different layout tool for different project phases. Right now, it’s Allegro. > > On Mar 18, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Bob Paddock wrote: > >> Comparison of old PCB software still in use. Compares ten free >> layout packages. Several I never heard of before. This was posted on >> EETimes yesterday: >> >> http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?cid=NL_EET_EDT_EET_pcbdesignline_20150318&_mc=NL_EET_EDT_EET_pcbdesignline_20150318&elqCampaignId=kpaddock.org&doc_id=1326046&page_number=9 Juste a question... On gschem screeshot, I can see some busses. Are busses supported by gnetlist ? I believe that this feature is not supported and is only 'in progress'... Best regards, JKB