X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] "Tried and True, Old PCB Design Software Still Going Strong" page 9 is gEDA From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:45:36 -0600 Message-Id: <71C7D46D-93AE-488F-B0E4-728641C2A63B@noqsi.com> References: To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t2IKjhlT000690 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk The MIT guy who does prototype layout for my spaceflight instruments uses (and likes) Osmond. I can’t comment on it, though, I don’t use it. On some projects, we use a contractor to lay out the final product. Geda-gaf has the enormous advantage that I can easily export the same schematics to a different layout tool for different project phases. Right now, it’s Allegro. On Mar 18, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Bob Paddock wrote: > Comparison of old PCB software still in use. Compares ten free > layout packages. Several I never heard of before. This was posted on > EETimes yesterday: > > http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?cid=NL_EET_EDT_EET_pcbdesignline_20150318&_mc=NL_EET_EDT_EET_pcbdesignline_20150318&elqCampaignId=kpaddock.org&doc_id=1326046&page_number=9 > > How do the other nine packages address the problems that constantly > get rehashed here? > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com