X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:03:07 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb alternatives In-Reply-To: <20150318151930.17892.qmail@stuge.se> Message-ID: References: <46050a0c DOT 619 DOT 14c2850d052 DOT Webtop DOT 45 AT optonline DOT net> <5508413E DOT 4000405 AT ecosensory DOT com> <46050a0c DOT 619 DOT 14c2850d052 DOT Webtop DOT 45 AT optonline DOT net> <20150318151930 DOT 17892 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Peter Stuge wrote: > > Parameterized part data is an important design goal for edacore; so > that things like pad length extending from package can be tweaked > globally per PCB design, for the prototype run that needs to be hand > soldered. I agree, edacore is a better long term solution. I forgot to mention this, but my suggestions did not aim to provide such a generic long term fix, but a temporary one that can bridge the gap short term and do not require any code modification in gschem, gaf or pcb. Regards, Igor2