X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av02.lsn.net Message-ID: <55089216.5040703@ecosensory.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:44:06 -0500 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb alternatives References: <5508413E DOT 4000405 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20150317182617 DOT 22729 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> In-Reply-To: <20150317182617.22729.qmail@stuge.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 03/17/2015 01:26 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Which elementary objects would you use instead of the current > predefined ones, and what would be a couple of concrete advantages? These are all on top of the low level John D. already mentioned: 1. A circuit path that has a netlist attribute and physics attribs ----> it is defined even when floating free of any pad. --> Setup of keepouts for autorouting, or manual power routing. --> Copper thickness defined for sims, compat. checks. 2. A pad ring that has a netlist attribute attached independent of being in a pad stack, and has a definition of being on a layer --> more direct and easier to parse in the code ---8-)--> buried vias can be implemented and simulations can extract capacitance data from physical shape without assumptions. 3. a non-conductive board material primitive with physical attribs ---> simulation and compatibility checks of subcircuit layouts and accurate 3D models become possible