X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb alternatives From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <201503171713.t2HHDVx3019790@envy.delorie.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:42:20 -0600 Message-Id: <1927E7C0-DF62-40D8-B1C9-2C3FD1B6C53C@noqsi.com> References: <5508413E DOT 4000405 AT ecosensory DOT com> <201503171713 DOT t2HHDVx3019790 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t2HHgIkV018921 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mar 17, 2015, at 11:13 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Instead, there are predefined complex objects with arbitrary magical >> properties, interacting in unpredictable ways. > > PCB is not arbitrary, magical, or unpredictable. It just doesn't work > the way you want it to work. > Magic is in the eye of the beholder. I realize that there are some who like pcb. I have no problem with that, but I find it unusable. Perhaps others find it unusable for different reasons. And you’ve complained about the fundamental problems yourself, noting that adding a feature to pcb involves defining and coding how it interacts with every other feature. That coding burden reflects a cognitive burden to users. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com