X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:08:24 +0100
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem refactoring ideas  -- overall architecture
 document.
Message-ID: <20150212090824.GA3142@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <54DBDFF1 DOT 1010409 AT ecosensory DOT com>
 <FE92BD5F-0CB3-4CAE-B3BC-D63D22B579DA AT noqsi DOT com>
 <mbgul5$j8i$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
 <220C1787-45BF-459E-B217-29686DC25DF2 AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <220C1787-45BF-459E-B217-29686DC25DF2@noqsi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details:   (-1.0 points)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: uni-hannover.de]
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -0.0 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
                             [score: 0.3358]
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:08:32PM -1000, John Doty wrote:
> 
> On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
> 
> > A unambiguous sort of symbols on save would finally solve a still standing 
> > issue you may remember: gnetlist behaves differently depending on the 
> > order symbols were added. 
> 
> I agree this is an annoyance. However, take account of the problem of filled graphics, where one may manipulate that order to get the appearance you want. That might require the addition of layer numbers to the format in to work with canonicalization. 

I believe filled graphics are a rather recent addition to gschem 
(I can't see any in my schematics), this rather shows that they 
were not properly designed in the first place IMO.

    Gabriel