X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net Message-ID: <54DA3AA5.9060902@ecosensory.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:06:45 -0600 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Hierarchy References: <3709636 DOT NVszrDDjOR AT jasum> <20150208135925 DOT 6f6ddab6 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <1897145 DOT BbSdS1MRWc AT jasum> <66DD3BF9-092C-4EFF-B12D-6214141C152D AT icloud DOT com> <52E0C8E3-2FD3-4D79-A01D-962E7EFA6D4F AT noqsi DOT com> <638942CE-E278-40ED-8C36-6A89C33FD158 AT noqsi DOT com> <54D7CC55 DOT 1090602 AT ecosensory DOT com> <54D8D57C DOT 6010901 AT ecosensory DOT com> <9F1DFB84-F10E-4834-A68C-44529867358B AT noqsi DOT com> In-Reply-To: <9F1DFB84-F10E-4834-A68C-44529867358B@noqsi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 02/09/2015 11:35 AM, John Doty wrote: >> If we had a document for what the >> >overall structure of gschem was, > Hierarchy in gschem is documented. Seehttp://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:gschem_ug:hierarchy. > >> >and how the desired new features of hierarchy where we can have schematics in schematics, > None required in gschem. But then you go on describing all kinds of changes you'd like... I still say an overall design specification or guideline is needed for anything like EDA tools or tool sets, and no, I would never suggest anything to harm your current way of doing things with gschem et al Mr. Doty.