X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Tcfdfch1neRArjcGEx9WTHjvdskH1jHpYIoyUSo+Icg=; b=UHUM/Hze9FzlrgKm7s+TbU27IiLuMJkNby5hCjenIRYo32u0HJWMVMolQZX2CxVU1q zvTg/OfCLeBSqjhrDD5TLQQYoxWOoNFk6cErss6RY0pgMEnmS6JYCHUIw4lQzeKJiBW7 re9RjCcTkuDC2Sfy15723v/alxBoCHxvUqICv+7indEWoulb8dF7i+Ozu9abiH2hP9+t meW9XZPb65YeSrmj1hbk7Ku++OIAuj5GEHgjl567wSt/9Lm8uSiEKI9uV4MdKLP+Z3Cv 5R3POKspfsS3CUXdxr6bn29FErGEN0m+FhQdah7WYXyzUXYv2YcvKcp4sZ9pJAWAGLPw L62A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.214.206 with SMTP id n197mr8924929oig.2.1423421694693; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:54:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <638942CE-E278-40ED-8C36-6A89C33FD158@noqsi.com> References: <3709636 DOT NVszrDDjOR AT jasum> <20150208135925 DOT 6f6ddab6 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <1897145 DOT BbSdS1MRWc AT jasum> <66DD3BF9-092C-4EFF-B12D-6214141C152D AT icloud DOT com> <52E0C8E3-2FD3-4D79-A01D-962E7EFA6D4F AT noqsi DOT com> <638942CE-E278-40ED-8C36-6A89C33FD158 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 19:54:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Using Lua to safely read configuration and layout files (program attached) From: Svenn Are Bjerkem To: geda-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113adb727a56f2050e9830c2 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a113adb727a56f2050e9830c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 February 2015 at 19:09, John Doty wrote: > No, gnetlist=E2=80=99s parser is complete. It just doesn=E2=80=99t expose= everything it > parses through the Scheme API. > I can't help myself asking: Why isn't the gnetlist code exposing the needed information to the API? Too difficult to do, or too boring to get done? --=20 Svenn --001a113adb727a56f2050e9830c2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 8 February 2015 at 19:09, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
No, gnetlist=E2=80=99s parser is complete. It just doesn=E2= =80=99t expose everything it parses through the Scheme API.

I can't help myself asking: Why isn't the gnetlist code = exposing the needed information to the API? Too difficult to do, or too bor= ing to get done?

--
Svenn
--001a113adb727a56f2050e9830c2--