X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sXmxgyboHFOcYNU5m6Feq9zBulVYZ7HyigkWyMsSJbw=; b=k3vChnrTB9vCm0pXBls9xurdkwBlRNntIlFxWrOYQ7Q/KyIWVGYj5FoG425dLzYYd6 I5SuRZ61XL4TA+qH667y7NZureyJVwTqrWwCvf61lklHovpb2QALIpHwxFskC5hOJ7Zh rxHKObm/6lsC42A0w932VQH9b0Jnt4LXXQhjrXhkV3bKd9pOBdcrKhAZXiK0jOF5XzL6 mVRjqgad2xe8ULRW60/4EWndMz7tFKxY1H0m78ffdmjhaVM6k6QWeBW0x+g6+GAefffx l5DKcehqxUqANWEUHxYedhKFuQnDJPasNJnQD4GIhvcciiXnH+Y+JvhlFIepflxcLb0w 5hsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.42.169 with SMTP id p9mr9645345lal.91.1423358854597; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:27:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201502080108.t1818x8P031447@envy.delorie.com> References: <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <1423323918 DOT 1592 DOT 10 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <1423329222 DOT 1592 DOT 12 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <54D67B5B DOT 6060205 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150207221252 DOT GA26071 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <201502072246 DOT t17MktFH026329 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201502080108 DOT t1818x8P031447 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:27:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM From: Evan Foss To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I don't disagree. I want to see the blue sky documentation. I just find this whole thing about Lua/XML to be a giant distraction. The current file format is extremely readable. It is the source that is not. I know people would like to never have to look at the text of say a footprint file but I have come to accept that it is just a part of life. On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 8:08 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> DJ while those are all really good ideas my impression of the PCB >> source is that it would take a lot of work to implement. > > That's an understatement, and the crux of the problem. > >> gschem's source was clear to me, PCB was not. > > PCB's source is *ancient*. Even a simple clean-up pass would be a > large undertaking. It's probably one of the first examples of > object-oriented programming. > >> It would be nice to have a draft of what the future PCB file format >> would look like building off of what we have now instead of >> reinventing the wheel. > > There are things we can do now. It's still important to have a > long-term goal in mind. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/