X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Xb1wWAR0SYpWyq4stciDBJYiZBFWIw9w325bqppPTs4=; b=yEsRXPYNfDgRgVBIKHji437ZINyGXqQMXHqADfKYkyxKoSy20LIlbYP0NxZd7nX2XJ oWqRic98HBGu3vzOTq0k1IkRullEtdVks/EZJl7XNt6Go5G3v7Inq3raydP0W6WphKMk sVowguHdcvzPeZBa2aXjGpZrtCyzhzIz9rnkMLb0rxLKss+raXj/G+CBVz3ed1QKStbt eajEU2vjycjyFzc61o0AiduafUABmv3XyEHkWlfnsz6EP072qMGRFw+X4nHvdybU4iar 9ysCdZuKPtq8KdqNiqge4oqEejGIjie7DFryLRaxfjbzyXFtVqpFbsPg+O5ADPhGdmvp URyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.193.214 with SMTP id r205mr6027581oif.63.1423330232814; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:30:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1423329222.1592.12.camel@cam.ac.uk> References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <1423323918 DOT 1592 DOT 10 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <1423329222 DOT 1592 DOT 12 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:30:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM From: Jason White To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Clifton wrote: > On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 11:20 -0500, Jason White wrote: > > > > It hardly seems that we would be "using" the underlying language at all; > you are merely borrowing its syntax for variable assignment, and using > its interpreter to avoid writing your own file parser. > > A similar thing (I think) would be S-Expressions, which most scheme / > lisp environments would be able to read very naturally, and without > execution. There is also JSON / JSONP and Javascript. Indeed, this is the point. You can use Lua for scripting and simultaneously you can make use of its parser for other purposes such as data and configuration files. The one thing that I find exciting is that with the data of a board or schematic stored as Lua variables and arrays, it becomes really trivial to write scripts that can act on your designs and modify them without going through all of the hassle of parsing a custom format. Thats where I want to go with this. -- Jason White