X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pishMLlSs0zBRtbKh6hbz969NuR3P8iDb0yPM5N8DLE=; b=BG4R85LseKeZR1fvKWiNZjHXd2l9kt0LA8PWwwJd9jOzWCXEHADRhrw3Y2TJzH0Xeq 7tQc7O0Njx26PqouJ7bLPfKvN/JbXrVxWDhGNCc9LKlW4J8oa+UEHml4mf2KTcWUQUj4 OZvhdimjTz4m3E0Plbp8uA8InHuAMUfBlVhf9Eud8F87cf/0iihXohmUUz3wkc+oggXB 1h/miwnLtMToPPhAIyfWz66ExBGUo5R699rwFm1aTD2+AQO1brd8tDd+Q01Lbj4TI2j7 JCdVukMnPQjXbBFAmED9d37M3aBnnu/QbmXbp3R9ZnU4mBCOTnHZpsiwPu7hX4S/wfXl 272Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.13.104 with SMTP id ex8mr102319wjd.12.1423169060729; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:44:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <54D3B04A DOT 3080308 AT neurotica DOT com> <54D3B7FF DOT 7010401 AT neurotica DOT com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:44:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM From: Marvin Dickens To: geda-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd092051f9df050e5d5eb0 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7bfd092051f9df050e5d5eb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I usually lurk on this list... With that said, gnu scheme closely adheres to the r5rs=E2=80=8B ieee standard. Aside from scheme being a rich and mature language, I am pretty sure the r5rs standard had/has a lot to do with it's use in gEDA and competing commercial products. Best Marvin Dickens On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Dave McGuire wrote: > > It's pretty clear that you simply don't like Scheme. That's fine, > > just keep it out of this thread. > > Please keep personal characterization out of both the thread and the list= . > I'm talking about the technology, and I think "that's for toys!" is > a poor basis for the project to make decisions on scripting languages. > > -- > Matthew Skala > mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca People before principles. > http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ > --047d7bfd092051f9df050e5d5eb0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I usually lurk on this list... With that said, gnu scheme = closely adheres to the r5rs=E2=80=8B ieee standard. Aside from=C2=A0
sc= heme being a rich and mature language, I am pretty sure the r5rs standard h= ad/has a lot to do with it's
use in gEDA and competing commer= cial products.


Best
=
Marvin Dickens
<= br>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, <msk= ala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Dave McGuire wrote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0It's pretty clear that you sim= ply don't like Scheme.=C2=A0 That's fine,
> just keep it out of this thread.

Please keep personal characterization out of both the thread and the= list.
I'm talking about the technology, and I think "that's for toys= !" is
a poor basis for the project to make decisions on scripting languages.

--
Matthew Skala
mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0People before pr= inciples.
http://ansuz.sooke.= bc.ca/

--047d7bfd092051f9df050e5d5eb0--