X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:22:27 -0500
Message-Id: <201502051822.t15IMRY7028777@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1502051225450.11811@localhost.localdomain>
	(mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CAOFvGD4M48Ap=UQzL_T3yzas2rJrNFfxXRUOkOe8gA8J3bQCHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502050141070 DOT 24630 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <54D3B04A DOT 3080308 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502051225450 DOT 11811 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Scheme is primarily not used at all.  Is that better?

Scheme is a LISP variant.  If you count all the LISP variants
together, it's a big set.