X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; s=default; t=1423085122; bh=8Yah+YxHYrkd8yjKwQqQaO+jq8ozcZdQ+TkpvzCCqB8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=LaTsz2vTKpRXWCpmv+JpqmrrLcZyh0B+qd/zGrWjHvjwHYzsQoqs4zcMh4CZRU/2p rAR28Qh3yAfLYi2sKuC+tFj525GlCyZRHe+xC8FbpQb8kkY11C8LWh3NOPaSu/KCuN Zm+lgwWskRdkqgVWImJG/vPXTfVKuiJA2gg2gYpA= Message-ID: <54D28E41.8010301@neurotica.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:25:21 -0500 From: Dave McGuire User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150204073758 DOT Horde DOT czAmF2JsXvWH254t3K1lrw2 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <201502041422 DOT 06437 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> In-Reply-To: <201502041422.06437.ad252@freeelectron.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 02/04/2015 02:22 PM, al davis wrote: >> By the way, why are m4 footprints deprecated in gEDA? That >> looks like a step backwards. > > It's really a move forwards. I think of m4 as the wire-wrap of > software. It's a great tool for hacking and experimenting, but > I would not use it for anything permanent. Years ago I used it > a lot to create the concept of a structure (C struct) in > FORTRAN. Today, whenever I see m4, I have flashbacks of the > days when all scientific programming was done in FORTRAN. I > have no desire to go back to that. Then you may be dismayed to know that quite a bit of it is STILL written in FORTRAN, though it bears little resemblance to our old friends FORTRAN-IV and FORTRAN-77. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ/3 New Kensington, PA