X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ppk92TiBC99oooRqWk7HEyjpcq7BKUkCScA+BPQWO/E=; b=RHB7uyPw6x/WGqiBSetrf6yL7b7kbjatuMBtUnalo53bFhKtbyNUw4iz5hy4doxFSu qmEefeSZSczFgrMaoD+o4CXo/AaOnpakOEMt9f+jm5GAojR3tuJjJfGYKI6JNu5uZvZe ioLJLKV9S/ooHbZ1BNOFsNBYr5DmhQ3u07YfW/cE8YKoF+1R0ND18aaZ9KN3qonZud9Z 5nhlnAGqiSwreiIAZfMFpuXsMOo5wfrWSbvwkHnIGzNgm+BZQs9Rq+RfMCdujrg4YAoA KZvlKshVB1EjplhGTmRI98+I1161RBK67KOqd63HhLM7mhwwX5a9vpXkG79OIt9t0F2Q jqFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.112 with SMTP id k16mr7809809wiv.42.1423079649187; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:54:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150204073758.Horde.czAmF2JsXvWH254t3K1lrw2@webmail.in-berlin.de> References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <20150204073758 DOT Horde DOT czAmF2JsXvWH254t3K1lrw2 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:54:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM From: Ouabache Designworks To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043891cdfa1dd9050e488c5d Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --f46d043891cdfa1dd9050e488c5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Hagen SANKOWSKI wrote: > If we could get all the eda teams currently supporting their own tool >> flows >> to contribute to a single open source solution then we would all be a lot >> better off. >> > > Well, everybody has it's own solution. With own pit falls, with own > advantages. > With open source tool flows you can donate code that demonstrates your advantages so that other designers with clumsier code can try out yours and switch over if they like. We got to start talking to each other and sharing ideals and problems. >> There is no money in this for Big EDA so don't expect any help from them >> but we need this. This could be the "Linux" of the EDA world. >> > > So, which requirements do you/we have? > > I want the architects to be able to enter the block diagram of an entire system in schematic form. The team can then take this and identify which blocks map to real parts (drams, drivers etc) and which ones go into an Digital chip. The emulation team can identify multiple FPGAs while the asic team only identifies their asic. Both teams work from the same source so that any changes are effective in both. Anything not identified as inside of a Digital chip is a real part mounted on a PCB. You can autogenerate the symbols for all digital chips and dump out separate netlists for the PCB and all the digital chips. You can identify any nodes for Signal Integrity checks and extract a spice model of the PCB traces along with IBIS models of the drivers. John Eaton --f46d043891cdfa1dd9050e488c5d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Hagen SANKOWSKI <= hsank AT nospa= m.chipforge.org> wrote:


If we could get all the eda teams currently supporting their own tool flows=
to contribute to a single open source solution then we would all be a lot better off.

Well, everybody has it's own solution. With own pit falls, with own adv= antages.

With= =C2=A0 open source tool flows you can donate code that demonstrates your ad= vantages so
that other designers with clumsier code can try o= ut yours and switch over if they like.


We got to start talking to each other and sharing ideals and problems.
There is no money in this for Big EDA so don't expect any help from the= m
but we need this. This could be the "Linux" of the EDA world.

So, which requirements do you/we have?



I want the architects = to be able to enter the block diagram of an entire system=C2=A0 in schemati= c form.=C2=A0 The team can then take this and identify which blocks map to = real parts (drams, drivers etc) and which ones go into an Digital chip. The= emulation team can identify multiple FPGAs while the asic team only identi= fies their asic. Both teams work from the same source so that any changes a= re effective in both.

Anything not identified as inside o= f a Digital chip is a real=C2=A0 part mounted on a PCB. You can autogenerat= e the symbols for all digital chips and dump out separate netlists for the = PCB and all the digital chips.

You can identify any node= s for Signal Integrity checks and extract a spice model of the PCB traces a= long with IBIS models of the drivers.

John Eaton

= =C2=A0

=C2=A0
--f46d043891cdfa1dd9050e488c5d--