X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=0Qit+rhnLMD0Q3gqtmOs1+bnq8TeTiEHdTvkz/FN+MY=;
        b=nJYKBoqAG/UAm02CkavcmFLOtZxUpwB8jJgf+PoiwsGKcER/a16UrAPQC7m9LBRGet
         MwsA1Z1MPJ0U52CcWGZAMsCDXzJGf8AjBfW/Te041zNaWGDUCuIdj5uWPeevCPKFX8ox
         RDQxlS8bBuToIShszl3qeDm8ECFPFF3tyo8Z0IhUYPtK/5Zkj3leOafhwlBbuvTmYj2I
         i2OJrjBsSQZt04dJ0Uha3qDDGpo7NUum5FNVSWWTyOOoZyc0eaW2lds4O4gGJ3RLA0YL
         fhn2UKoaM/BCgzZVbQMS8lNpBe5Tey1ODwu5aBqpcL+CG3tJgFuZTuTpo+Xsgm8muPH3
         PMTQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.13.97 with SMTP id g1mr25051795igc.42.1423070089246; Wed,
 04 Feb 2015 09:14:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl>
	<54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan>
	<20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:14:49 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c8YPiXUKQrQYxU0sX-PaTdY-0dzrGOinUS61uuKZ4cnig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
From: Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
<svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com> wrote:
>
> On 4 February 2015 at 06:27, Ouabache Designworks <z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com>
> wrote:
>>
>> This is the ideal problem for an open source solution. We all need to do
>> the same thing. We are all currently spending a huge effort to create our
>> own unique solutions. The problems are really not that hard. Our toolflows
>> and scripts are not critical IP that we cannot share. If you wanted to
>> create a tool flow that was better than 75% of all the toolflows out then
>> then that is not hard to do.
>
>
> We just need to agree which scripting language to use for the flow. /Duck

Well obviously we should choose javascript so we can do everything in
the browser.
No wait that's old-school, we should choose java so we can do
everything on phone.

Britton