X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=gYZPejvoyGzd2mJPPOY97QGCnyGm0HNexiJD2FztvCo=;
        b=d6SQtty/Fk8UxFP5ulYVx4f9GUlr/NTzaoxaj5rPElg4n+jHI0nc29jnNWafLDx13j
         np4GZPsBSK/rvIYuwOFanpHD5YfmTd09hkFqRP6sTL0t/P8tAUL4NdyJGJhKnb9AVJc6
         /lfcL6Ct8X/W9MeUiymDHxIHJp4yK0V57ughydsJxnxpleLRBtJCPRBLlJIMHmM0SqGF
         EnbQD1Hzx4GtOXejq7J9GEsKi31tqap0Lh9kZQ3wIG6ZZ0s1Av6a5ixl6Ctb/IpW1Gpr
         WgT9+A0hF2QAkOiyMNZlo0EK07vty3GDWUcAQLJxPmZBvJxGIs7PDO6SiPoqkge31d75
         2kCQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.94.79 with SMTP id a15mr20668723icn.30.1422909515628;
 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:38:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54CFD589.9040702@xs4all.nl>
References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl>
	<54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:38:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
From: Javier Serrano <javier DOT serrano DOT pareja AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Bert Timmerman <bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl> wrote:

> On arriving around 12.00 h there was a sign on the door stating "FULL" and
> not to enter due to safety reasons (in itself a very good precaution),
> though this failed after the ongoing talk and people were let in anyway, as
> not to miss out on the opportunity.

Yes, I started following the guidelines pretty strictly, then relaxed
them completely. I was feeling bad for the people waiting outside. We
definitely need a bigger room.

> Time in between talks was often filled with Q&A and discussions, and because
> of turmoil from people leaving and entering I found little chance to start a
> conversation with fellow devs.

I had not thought of that. Maybe next year we could schedule some idle
time between talks for people to walk around and discuss. I am
planning to ask people for suggestions in the EDA devroom mailing list
[1] (not used so far). Feel free to subscribe if you want to
participate in the discussion.

> By this way I would like to thank Javier Serrano for organizing this room
> and being a perfect host and master of ceremonies.

Thanks Bert! You guys made it very easy to run things smoothly.

Cheers,

Javier

[1] https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/eda-devroom