X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:24:26 +0100 From: Gabriel Paubert To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Any good repository for datasheets in pdf out there? Message-ID: <20150114152426.GB17876@visitor2.iram.es> References: <54B57095 DOT 20000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150114114830 DOT GA24995 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20150114150259 DOT 9925 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150114150259.9925.qmail@stuge.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3396] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 04:02:59PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: > Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > The temperature range was specified as -200C to 260C, they recently > > changed the lower end of the temperature range to -70C. > .. > > Reducing the range of a temperature probe by 130C without even > > touching the part number is unacceptable in my eyes > > I don't expect that they made any change to the probes. They just > fixed the documentation. My guess is that your old probes have > exactly the same performance as new ones. Not sure, the line specifying the errors at -200C has disappeared in the new datasheets. Gabriel