X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1414007359.1391.3.camel@ssalewski.de> Subject: Re: [geda-user] Is someone using busses in gschem? From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:49:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <201410221838.s9MIcOFM005839@envy.delorie.com> References: <1413980823 DOT 1391 DOT 1 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <201410221838 DOT s9MIcOFM005839 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 14:38 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > I have an example of using busses here: > > http://www.delorie.com/electronics/rx/os-board.html > > Page 3 of the pdf or os-bus.sch in the design files. Interesting. So current gschem busses are only a visual guide of connectivity, with no impact to netlist. (Netlist connectivity is determined by netnames in your example). And the behaviour seems to be, that 'bus rippers' are generated, when we connect nets to these busses. Coding that should be not difficult, so maybe I will add it to PetEd soon. But I am not fully convinced that editing busses is really easier than drawing some plain lines, at least I did not managed to draw busses when I used gschem for the first time. http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:gschem_ug:pins_nets_buses