X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:45:03 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Chinese glyph rendering in pcb as symbols Message-ID: <20140905184503.GG3196@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <201409051618 DOT s85GIdb8024685 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <5409F1C2 DOT 3090406 AT xs4all DOT nl> <201409051752 DOT s85Hqnr2027362 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20140905181756 DOT GF3196 AT cicely7 DOT cicely DOT de> <201409051822 DOT s85IMjsa028284 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201409051822.s85IMjsa028284@envy.delorie.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:22:45PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > If we really have to embed binary data, then I would very much > > prefer any kind of hex or mime encoding, so that it's still possible > > to edit the non binary parts. > > I really would rather avoid hex/mime as an embedding mechanism. Yech! I'm not a big fan of it either, but I'm a big fan of the current ASCII board data. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.