X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1409831294.1154.1.camel@ssalewski.de> Subject: Re: [geda-user] Nice new end-of-net markers From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:48:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 00:41 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > The triangle achieves a nice improvement of usability. Yes, looks nice, I will copy it :-) This reminds me to the fact that I was never able to remember when I have to use netname= or when net=. I think one is for nets, and the other can exists in symbols. And other people have mixed it too in the past, I can remember at least on post... May it be possible to have only net attribute and some smart logic in gnetlist to do the right think when it is attached to nets or to symbols?