X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=TCo5M4vScRbE4X7xWCqu6czaX0CChl14LwZe+IZCAA0=;
        b=BH+CYM4MAXACdpIdIdsYwZLZwm5FmZJN6QQoUeljudChAwUcFKpuw6ggybynSVRPj5
         uXATHt+o0NoP0BhvVnY1/o/F1G9+9fvZdNV7/N9dIRQK8+tXrPwVGclhB49fwzIbl0cn
         pFCklka3XwnQueBx5psS0jWTVlBTma7NXE4iB0olVruxUgAXNairIFh+poVv2tAF8BPB
         XzR2fWGUILpTCFyNqkVkGki4Nqd9824OpJXTL5T+9GXe6nvSBKPM7xIuYJmeW31f4KIv
         2G1UUVIU012tc+EERvn7GqTSURlKpAGyOXxe745GFMGwsBBLAqA2B0SNcthynNDWGMu9
         uFhQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.43.65 with SMTP id u1mr1271076lal.5.1407215517472;
        Mon, 04 Aug 2014 22:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:11:54 +0400
From: Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pin Type Dialog
Message-ID: <20140805051154.GB22564@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD AT sbcglobal DOT net>
 <20140804105713 DOT GH24580 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <F8F84CB2-551D-4D4D-A544-56986B1442CF AT sbcglobal DOT net>
 <20140804183141 DOT GA11585 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <75BE262E-75FC-40E5-9A49-B5EFD4F370CA AT sbcglobal DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <75BE262E-75FC-40E5-9A49-B5EFD4F370CA@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:50:33PM -0700, Edward Hennessy wrote:
...
> I think the pin types need to be exposed in a consistent GUI format,
> until the functionality is changed (or removed) in the future.
Agreed.

> The new dialogs provide expander widgets to hide sections. I can look
> at using the mechanism that stores dialog locations to also store the
> preference to keep sections hidden for the users that don't need them.
> This way, the for the users that don't need the pin type, it will
> remain hidden.
This would be nice.