X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: pcjc2 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:05:51 +0100 From: "Peter C.J. Clifton" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Cc: Gabriel Paubert Subject: Re: [geda-user] Gerber Export Generates Abitrary Drill Tool Numbers In-Reply-To: <20140716080241.GA9087@visitor2.iram.es> References: <53C56517 DOT 2030901 AT hagertechnologies DOT com> <20140716080241 DOT GA9087 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> Message-ID: X-Sender: pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.4 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 2014-07-16 09:02, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 01:29:59PM -0400, Geoffrey Yerem - HEAT, LLC > wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm having a small problem with the Gerber export in PCB. When it >> generates the cnc drill file, it starts the tool numbers at an >> arbitrary count. > > Not exactly an aribtrary count, it uses the same number space for > Gerber > apertures and drill numbers. I think we deliberately don't re-use numbers between the various files we export. This allows people to copy+paste outline / random notes layer content in the output file into the files for other layers - without any apperture clashes / conflicts. I'd suggest you change your board house. If their CAM software is so broken in one respect, I would suspect there could be other issues lurking. It also speaks to a certain lack of investment in their process, so who knows where else they will be using sub-standard workflows. For our ammusement, you might find out which vendor supplied their BROKEN CAM software, which version it is / which centuary they purchased it. Sorry not to be more helpful.. As Gabriel said, you may be able to patch the source-code to achieve what you want. Just be SURE to check the Gerber files that result actually preview correctly in a gerber viewer (like "gerbv") before sending them for manufacture. Regards, Peter Clifton