X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:26:52 -0500 (CDT) From: mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca X-X-Sender: mskala AT localhost DOT localdomain To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Silkscreened component values, mailing list, and gEDA development In-Reply-To: <1404129760.16971.8.camel@pcjc2lap> Message-ID: References: <1404129760 DOT 16971 DOT 8 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Peter Clifton wrote: > > I have found bug reports about this dating at least as far back as May > > 2005, but nothing seems to have been done about it in nine years. > > Its not like we can arbitrarily change any of the existing symbols.. > doing so would break otherwise working designs. Is that really true? At least on the PCB side, changes to footprint files don't seem to take effect on a board unless the user goes through a laborious process to manually replace them one by one. -- Matthew Skala mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/