X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <1403800440.25929.14.camel@pcjc2lap> Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb: Patch for arcs with different radii for x and y on screen From: Peter Clifton To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:34:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <53A7E8F0.8020905@philippklostermann.de> References: <53A7E8F0 DOT 8020905 AT philippklostermann DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, Philipp Klostermann wrote: > Am 21.06.2014 14:30, schrieb Peter Clifton: > Isn't this rather a general problem, not restricted to elliptical arcs? Yes, but elliptical arcs are the only primitive we currently support in PCB that are not well supported by the common export formats we target / may wish to target. The one thing to be aware of, if you use elliptical arcs in footprints, is that due to their parametrisation, such footprints cannot correctly be rotated by arbitrary angles. A fix for that will probably (in the first instance), adding rotation as an explicit transformation to the footprint as a while - rather than as we currently do, applying the transformation to each individual entity within the footprint. If elliptical arcs were useful enough, we might consider extending the representation in PCB to allow arbitrary rotation of that primitive as well. Peter -- Peter Clifton Clifton Electronics