X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <5341CA0F.7060506@ecosensory.com> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:41:35 -0500 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Cooper arcs in footprint References: <20140405205029 DOT 14318 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1396743176 DOT 2085 DOT 10 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <1396790359 DOT 2087 DOT 15 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> In-Reply-To: <1396790359.2087.15.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 04/06/2014 08:19 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 13:23 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > I think gerber formats supports arcs. >> > >> >Indeed, but it does not support ellipses: > That is interesting (and surprising for me). If that is true, maybe we > should restrict support to circular arcs only -- which is much simpler. The circular sections only limitation could be historical accident, or because it is easier to analyze paths with a simple curvature and constant width perpendicular to path. Stretched sections would have varying widths, so they'd be worse for constant impedance paths, which has been one motivator for smooth curvy paths.