X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1396743176.2085.10.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [geda-user] Cooper arcs in footprint From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 02:12:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20140405205029 DOT 14318 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 19:49 -0400, Evan Foss wrote: > I had this problem last year. I was trying to do a footprint for a PCB > mounted microphone. In the end I had to approximate it by using a lot > of short strait traces at angles. Indeed KiCad users had that problem, I guess they still have it. KiCad had no support for copper arcs at all about one year ago! For your microphone there is a simple solution -- ad a copper arc in PCB editor after you had positioned the footprint with missing arc. I still wonder why KiCad has avoided copper arcs so long, and why PCB avoided copper arcs in footprints. I think gerber formats supports arcs. One problem with arcs is: If we have stretched arcs, DRC may be much more difficult -- I have to admit that I have no idea how to test stretched arcs for intersection with other elements (fast). Another problem can be autorouting when we have arcs on the board -- for geometrical and topological routers there should be some difficulties.