X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20140318201929.15819.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:19:29 +0100
From: Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-20140316 is released
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <201403170355 DOT s2H3tavv007601 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <532741F8 DOT 8090101 AT buffalo DOT edu> <201403171845 DOT s2HIj1kj012076 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <53282C68 DOT 3040908 AT prochac DOT sk> <201403181659 DOT s2IGxV8R011102 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <5328A141 DOT 4000405 AT prochac DOT sk> <201403181942 DOT s2IJgwwr018329 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20140318195939 DOT 14238 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <201403182003 DOT s2IK3vCY019924 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201403182003.s2IK3vCY019924@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

DJ Delorie wrote:
> We always branch because we change the sources on the branch to
> reflect the release name.  I.e. head says "1.99z" in About, but the
> release branches have 20140316 (or whatever) instead.

Understand now. I'd do that in the build system, but oh well. :)


> If someone wants to go back and tag all the release points, go ahead.

Not as neccessary when there is a branch, but I for one would prefer
tags on master to the branch approach. Of course that doesn't really
matter unless I become a significant contributor. Sorry for the noise. :)


//Peter