X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=/bJ5o8Cm3APVP0UuFfIbYvF94ykkkkXpNCcqQqDhhjs=;
        b=TaGREvzGqJBROLQYkWDvWDfqmvGfDD3fjQG5PpFpAOHrSkcDAIKQKMb0fZzQJDvYUO
         4JR+BxtZ6vlB9eV9TyCKg1apVk58AUg+tTPncnlMnc+laaQEWDXzmS6jWtDfiaGHtYwL
         XHAlqvNWdBxazeFamdGepxI7PKVg5SkddJELTgn+oCcRqUmqCNpLquuCs88xtVy9pTBj
         sHuyBDnV/ov6g61JPyRdaRCHb2if55TgoodcwHolCsy2jq5UAmxCrAHwv+m3ldVsPNjR
         YlO8BnE4UxYs7TdNm8tIyYr2YY5UxxXYNXHRoUvfpaosEhHhs7vdHql9sMXF5LujhuSF
         Iw4A==
X-Received: by 10.112.221.227 with SMTP id qh3mr713900lbc.55.1395144720014;
        Tue, 18 Mar 2014 05:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:11:57 +0400
From: Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-20140316 is released
Message-ID: <20140318121157.GB24197@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <201403170355 DOT s2H3tavv007601 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <532741F8 DOT 8090101 AT buffalo DOT edu>
 <201403171845 DOT s2HIj1kj012076 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <20140317185419 DOT GB5081 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <201403171856 DOT s2HIuDTJ012716 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <20140317191258 DOT GC5081 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <201403171921 DOT s2HJLmgp014261 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201403171921.s2HJLmgp014261@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:21:48PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > > I think the next major version bump will be 4.0, to avoid conflict
> > > with the TCL/TK version that claims it's 3.0.
> > 
> > Then let's wait for 1.299z ... I'm afraid somebody may release 4.0
> > and 5.0 meantime :)
> 
> the TCL/3.0 version has been out for a long time, so there's no
> "meantime" involved.  We just haven't had a good reason to make a
> major version number bump yet.

I was kidding, probably I haven't used correct tenses for English verbs
here, don't judge me so severely ;)

Seriously, what changes do you consider important enough to bump
the version? Will mil->um changes do? As for me, the versioning scheme
major.minor would be better and would allow to make minor fixes into
distributions more quickly.