X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=gwzhagtjkG5XZVDJBy7dslNW0fn8FCQkk20orZzdG4Y=;
        b=L84Po+yrSD56PaOu76P400Z2bBmLcf5XbYg6G6Y6QkLxSJy/qM1OkrmJm+V6g/iE6+
         GSkyAv4izekAAtq+c3+vxExCRi+nmXTfN2cUrp1iM+PAUONPgw26PAJ5R36WvP5CsfPu
         YF8K0l6HLnIUoyGbY1sz6bNeHO7egO7striIZcbNH1lRVBHbxibtnGw1sB1HveWtwsri
         JQAbrCU+6dMqzjMoAmPvZcZR9bH9qKkz19E13pH1ZQz8XvAJUYgPGQV5JWybUw8sh0Ab
         ovr1BJyVRCVXmwp0/AzHwO1ZRDx+lFhqNvGXa9nXCwY46dUE+iG82VLCtVbskGdJSeTf
         S45w==
X-Received: by 10.153.5.33 with SMTP id cj1mr108331lad.65.1395143874274;
        Tue, 18 Mar 2014 04:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:57:51 +0400
From: Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-20140316 is released
Message-ID: <20140318115751.GA24197@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <201403170355 DOT s2H3tavv007601 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <53276DBE DOT 8090609 AT unige DOT ch>
 <201403172155 DOT s2HLtt7T023352 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201403172155.s2HLtt7T023352@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:55:55PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> Those failed for me and I updated the tests to match what seemed to be
> the right data.  Check that commit and see if the previous versions
> worked for you.  If so, I'm confused about why ;-)
> 
> (the "bug" was that the tool sizes and cut depths were zero instead of
> the "real" values - mine had read values, not the zeros)
No, the bug is described at https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/1074268
and a patch is provided. The real bug is using comma in German locale
as the decimal separator when the golden files were generated. Like you,
the author (Traumflug) has verified the previous data and found them to
be good.

The reason I've not added the patch to the repo is the fact that I have
not managed to verify the new data are correct. LinuxCNC (EMC2), where I
tried to look at the result, does not show the width of milled lines and
all I saw there was therefore worthless (also taking into account the
ridiculous um values some tests use for milling depth).

Another reason is the fact that really there are two bugs with gcode and
the second one is probably related to what system you use to compile
pcb. IIUC, the bug with gcode3 and with png export appear only on 32-bit
systems.