X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] identical symbol names
In-reply-to: <531D222C.8060101@ecosensory.com>
References: <CAG4ve9LgHNoVZoGaGgF67tadJ_n=L6Uy1g=UPPrkM0fL6Rgufw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140127234944 DOT 924148045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAG4ve9+3jhFJ1Cr6CLUyLX_y02uigJECiUCwxjUWdP=heVocqg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140128201110 DOT DF7D78045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20140129072550 DOT GA24560 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAG4ve9+v9QxNRaPSFkmGfr6bKsv7km-Gt_gwXF7Eh4TX+AmNug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL2JBUdF93kZF-iQ9Rv+VTN3iXoT+6C4LoBi5qaMxof=sA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG4ve9+QsUf=nVXPe-f3VddGiqHn8sjZUJNkdu3QV1cOQDWiAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <86CABBE6-EE80-4347-B7AA-3F5A8DA4C658 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAG4ve9LX0mYk2a1zpfWJJC=OP5Weq9pt3PF7_Nqx5vX4wpR=Bg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1394402434 DOT 2151 DOT 28 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <20140309235005 DOT 783608020170 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <531D222C DOT 8060101 AT ecosensory DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
   message dated "Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:23:40 -0500."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <20140310103056.E1B1D8020170@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:30:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

John Griessen:
> On 03/09/2014 06:50 PM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> >   But bigger schematics also
> > means a lot of other things that I don't have experience about. My guess
> > that putting the symbol in a library section of the file simply doesn't
> > cut it.
> Right.  For chip design, or large flat organic semi circuit design,
> you use and reuse modules with the same name again and again
> and hit the identical name problem sooner.  References to same-name-but-different-content
> modules in different libraries is normal in large designs.

That says that the "identical symbol name" problem should be solved for 
such cases, but that is no argument against Алексей's "in file library 
section" solution. Do you have any take on that ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57