X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=WnCu2VHzYDR42tF079Vi0YJkPf3Aspci8B+JVePMoP8=; b=Pm1qtMQLV+a3UrDDAhyWJa3IrN1gcc07DQzIeci2lASfr0XUokHbkQxjlduJiPKR/M tD1HvCf0UTBY4o85WBcLVHCQpLbr65G+DBRjCVyws5HGVDpULcVIiWOrI221GN266yhn amGzrXcfgWvUDmwPeXtI5Oh1Hgeugm5JsFcp6qCnB7GTL8CpbKEb5/Mjc5UgvNa8MbeV f0Vs9n+vLtcExVkeeGKZ4XcZRc9GAJFWtiCdTp61EvtiSV+EVSj1niWzuyLliIYWjAX1 n6n1MMw8hlNnXClzl5SWVyPls/DjmV2fiTVBvUcXTwxAN0fk5qZUjMHm6yek1ECM5HM3 CraA== X-Received: by 10.112.27.176 with SMTP id u16mr4576107lbg.81.1393003135035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:18:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:18:51 +0400 From: Vladimir Zhbanov To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Message-ID: <20140221171851.GB3599@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <5305190D DOT 3020507 AT ecosensory DOT com> <3Q3 DOT JW8u DOT 3zIDACCYyBi DOT 1J1RgG AT seznam DOT cz> <20140220154313 DOT GA28382 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <5wu.JWAu.4}M7a1xMt58 DOT 1J1oRu AT seznam DOT cz> <20140221115505 DOT GA25030 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 07:32:30AM -0500, Joshua Lansford wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov > <[1]vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > > There are many questions and corner cases. What should the program > do with multipin symbols, where to break nets and change their > direction. This depends on where and how the nets are connected or > unconnected and how tight the schematic is. > > Ha. I remembered not to top post. :-) :) > Here is a senior design project I worked on > that maintains orthogonal nets. Test it to see how it handles the > boundary cases. > [2]http://sourceforge.net/projects/cedarlogic/ Thanks for the pointer. I hope I'll have some more time some day to look at it.