X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5mEj0+o60ClUu/K79HEoKlYOXYQvQfrPU3vyvjbF+fc=; b=NQ1ZEQ+E24DLt01Y+ldKkPsDT7lfF/31/26fdPtJk3Vbpu8rEQXHHE0pWT4l5TN8R7 h3fiWtApln27ik75PIDz1a++ixqY93H3uiXkwkQjjOVd/tr/GZ52nSn5QAwLX7JZMloK a91yBOqZ7v4ffdqyA6C4f1+hlr7zFmP0Ui9EexxnHbptszjzzXe1H1X8zlSItPzZsbT8 EmANvg0eMboBJ/lao0nYFSTYSO14/wGyi0uhTdJjPfqS0R4djcf/DQPxDDIqhilufIAo 1/eZ4tWyqT7TKijrVVxQBqjGb441UXvJmAr3utXoC1Cg2rLh1sO/c9gsHH+wTmOu1M4J CPRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlpmQyKGUVPAOfErGjwL500DAKWKnwLwhv3HcjmO0OjlZhdvHz5OBcUk6Z3P1rOovBgXpWR X-Received: by 10.180.100.70 with SMTP id ew6mr2140184wib.57.1392898681605; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 04:18:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3Q3.JW8u.3zIDACCYyBi.1J1RgG@seznam.cz> References: <5305190D DOT 3020507 AT ecosensory DOT com> <3Q3 DOT JW8u DOT 3zIDACCYyBi DOT 1J1RgG AT seznam DOT cz> From: Joshua Lansford Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:17:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 gaf really made printing of multiple pages a whole lot easier for me. ~Joshua On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Vaclav Peroutka wrote: > Hello, > > is there some "release notes" document with fixed bugs and new features ? > I could not find it on geda-project.org > > Thanks in advance, > Vaclav > > Od: John Griessen > > On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote: > > How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? The geda/gaf > documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'), > > which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the > newer version? > > Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before starting a new > project. > There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code. > > --f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
gaf really made printing of multiple pages a whole lot eas= ier for me.
~Joshua

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Vaclav Peroutk= a <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz> wrote:
Hello,

is there some "relea= se notes" document with fixed=20 bugs and new features ? I could not find it on geda-project.org

Thanks=20 in advance,
Vaclav

Od: John Griessen=20 <john@>


On 02/19/2014 1= 1:52 AM, JAMES HARIG=20 wrote:
> How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? T= he=20 geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'),> which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the newer=20 version?

Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before= =20 starting a new project.
There's little risk of something broken badl= y in=20 the latest code.

--f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2--