X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seznam.cz; s=beta; t=1392884370; bh=BOtYwdaggasZef1ISZrLUi1bSlox/+30FRsprcMr4Cw=; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Mime-Version: X-Mailer:Content-Type; b=dNmYgY8hcNL9DIuWO1601DTksi3Cj9fO35NjTsKfq3GnH9zBBGvPmO5zt1emVaVdX ZIC2K/eI7CFS7jlpq3Ake14vRDVM0dQXJjZOj1v8vReW2tdvrRrzMA1zRpKe/Ffl0I JI45LTxldfmq/MBbRJXzwY6c62DZ6dvOhSVosyJU= From: "Vaclav Peroutka" To: Subject: Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:19:28 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <3Q3.JW8u.3zIDACCYyBi.1J1RgG@seznam.cz> References: <5305190D DOT 3020507 AT ecosensory DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (szn-mime-1.1.2) X-Mailer: szn-ebox-4.4.138 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_=" Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com --=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, is there some "release notes" document with fixed bugs and new features ? I could not find it on geda-project.org Thanks in advance, Vaclav Od: John Griessen "On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote: > How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? The geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'), > which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the newer version? Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before starting a new project. There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code." --=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_= Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello,

is there some "release notes" document with fixed bugs and new features ? I could not find it on geda-project.org

Thanks in advance,
Vaclav

Od: John Griessen <john@>

On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote:
> How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? The geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'),
> which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the newer version?

Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before starting a new project.
There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code.

--=_6b6fe470048b280114b02b17=d6e102e6-314d-5078-a5d1-6a1c31534293_=--