X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <5305190D.3020507@ecosensory.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:50:21 -0600
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?
References: <CAOkiwat+o+GRSRmv4pqYPvuqwEeXa_+A1esiX_DToDcTLsKKZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOkiwat+o+GRSRmv4pqYPvuqwEeXa_+A1esiX_DToDcTLsKKZg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote:
> How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?  Are people using it?  The geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'),
> which are not in the 1.8 release.  Is there a real benefit to using the newer version?

Sure.  It has the most bugs fixed.  I always update before starting a new project.
There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code.