X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=srQtokt9KNeR27C77HV+J6PGOca0EmujnfaC5artFKc=;
        b=IGtpaq9+omULeVQ8n1wwkEKVzuzZ5vVfLpV3Y8Oz5sHwMgnwaXnrUhUWvysb6mOoF5
         4NcZ2MXV2wi7h27LTcLH9G8/gVFtw94LXLOiPAm5loadP6McaXg9oguZIgUyY9GC/zCd
         TW6vIAhkP/D9kxf9X1uiBs4HHTbU0942VyqQuJwtvmS5cJR2WENTVSng69K4X0wHUCd9
         MsoWHl3tCF9B8Ma7sRRHRm+Hzr6lPPBXi6IIZ8/NKOAGGXETmEznxRYQt2cZGF4dDCep
         Bnikh11kO+LBPM8TCaEwfGivhH0Dp53N7MygdetPAsv8C+xM8UTL/+vG/yO75IVfR4YA
         P/cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.211.1 with SMTP id my1mr3813866pbc.55.1392832345660; Wed,
 19 Feb 2014 09:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:52:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOkiwat+o+GRSRmv4pqYPvuqwEeXa_+A1esiX_DToDcTLsKKZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?
From: JAMES HARIG <jharig23 AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c6b231e08a04f2c60ddd
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--e89a8ff1c6b231e08a04f2c60ddd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?  Are people using it?  The geda/gaf
documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'), which are not in
the 1.8 release.  Is there a real benefit to using the newer version?

-James

--e89a8ff1c6b231e08a04f2c60ddd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? =A0Are people using it=
? =A0The geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example &#39;gaf&=
#39;), which are not in the 1.8 release. =A0Is there a real benefit to usin=
g the newer version?<div>
<br></div><div>-James</div><div><br></div></div>

--e89a8ff1c6b231e08a04f2c60ddd--