X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=Hj3WhSaz4gnwJl7JLUUQOCg189xCJR79xKfMXjVK0b8=;
        b=SNlQhcmI8lFsM4a+AVsL8MwERs+w3lVfchQymS9swHyzL+cEF/XoEnY+FEai6xC2ED
         nqZs9YOSWQofUeASYLmaK7NdnRaCj04L5T8exJ/8KRYXqwLyhAYch2r0HkS82ZjQb8fD
         0p5ZqBbDLji7FvxXUWti0Fb5wtYLl37FSvs8xvCfDwAlnlUmGQD8lAYNnGhqVSGnfQiH
         k+DSc9JdrP6H2ThI3lV1wNV5dvv0F+soKh9jhcmn/oT3okICFXt2JIai6rR3Dq+PVN5c
         6Z5rR4u+Gw6o/O5syHhNaKsN0Jm4DhI32l1LtY9QhY82OBB3yoMpFYUbNDRL4xZw5msP
         4+CQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.135.102 with SMTP id pr6mr255647lbb.43.1389692954359;
        Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:49:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:49:10 +0400
From: Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Fwd: gnetlist silently drops components
Message-ID: <20140114094910.GA3340@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAGRhJMZEWsXnVuJ_pCKqBovr71trDFD_93HCpfLaaS-h99=wxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAGRhJMYm3Hy2t6Ejkvm2hTPprQH6LwRqcqU2asJ4hBnaNASgVg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAGRhJMZJeJukswvFup=atf=Zwfk78j0jDL4_OQZ2t4SatyQN8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGRhJMZJeJukswvFup=atf=Zwfk78j0jDL4_OQZ2t4SatyQN8g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Joshua

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 07:38:22AM -0500, Joshua Lansford wrote:
...
>    At first I thought I would just make a check script to make sure no
>    components are dropped, but then I thought perhaps I might also be able
>    to fix gnetlist and further this project.  But thought I would check in
>    with everyone to make sure this isn't like this for a reason or perhaps
>    has already been fixed.
I can confirm gnetlist drops the components whose value= attribute is empty.
I use the last git version so the bug still exists.

Could you file a bug report on launchpad, please?

I think the solution should be discussed since neither gnetlist
nor gschem output any error in such cases while gschem forbids
empty attribute values according to the Master Attribute document,
and I believe they should do.

Thanks