X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:25:36 +0100 From: Jan Kasprzak To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Gschem nets without explicit connections Message-ID: <20131229212536.GB27189@fi.muni.cz> References: <20131229205407 DOT GA27189 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-Muni-Spam-TestIP: 147.251.48.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.7 (tirith.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.35]); Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:25:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at tirith.ics.muni.cz X-Virus-Status: Clean Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Stuart Brorson wrote: : I believe you can attach a net= attribute to your symbol. Here's some : documentation about it: : : http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:master_attributes_list#net : http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:na_howto Thanks. I have read the above documents, and it looks like the way I am supposed to do is to add the attribute net=netname1:pinnumber1,netname2:pinnumber2,... to the component (e.g. the MCU) itself. This would not result in readable schematics, though. The Arduino schematics below has the net name assigned and visible near each pin of the connector and MCU. Or am I misinterpreting the above documents? Thanks, -Yenya -- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak | | New GPG 4096R/A45477D5 - see http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/pgp-rollover.txt | | http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Journal: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/ | Please don't top post and in particular don't attach entire digests to your mail or we'll all soon be using bittorrent to read the list. --Alan Cox